MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209473980 · doi:10.33731/52020.233745

The state of innovative development and further steps towards the neo-economy of Ukraine in the first quarter of the XXI century

2021· article· en· W3209473980 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTheory and Practice of Intellectual Property · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Issues in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBackwardnessLaggingModernization theoryState (computer science)Quarter (Canadian coin)Economic systemAmbiguityEconomicsBusinessEconomyPolitical scienceEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Revutsky S. The state of innovative development and further steps towards the neo-economy of Ukraine in the first quarter of the XXI century. The article examines the state of innovative development in Ukraine in comparison with world leaders. Comparative analysis of goals, priorities and directions of development and modernization of public policy to achieve the level of neo-economy, which is formed under the influence of the new paradigm of scientific and technological development and technological revolution, which is now observed in many countries. From the above data we see that among the common shortcomings of our economic strategy and development program are: ambiguity and inconsistency of goals, mechanisms and objectives, sources of funding and general backwardness in approaches, which requires the use of European approaches to achieve the goal. Relying only on outdated methods of production and labor, the country loses competitiveness in the world market, lagging behind in technological development due to lack of innovation and research in the necessary areas, while the existing system is uncertain and has no financial or legal basis for efficient operation. When the whole world moves to new technological levels, raising its level to the fifth and sixth levels, our state, without a clear leadership and base, lags behind in innovation. That is why the article substantiates the conceptual principles of strategic development of the state, priorities and mechanisms for using the innovation potential to increase the competitiveness of Ukraine.The article also considers the possibility of implementation European practices for effective management of the implementation of targeted innovation programs, substantiation of software, strengthening of existing and modernization of existing to obtain competitive advantages in the modern world market. Currently, the country has a major lack of a clear line of leadership on innovation. There are a number of small and fragmented programs that operate separately from each other, there is no clear government leadership, which leads to a slowdown in development. Currently, the main goal for Ukraine should be the scientific development of its capabilities, their development and implementation of the knowledge of European colleagues to modernize existing and explore new ways to improve our level of technological structure.Keywords: steps to neo-economy, technological ways, medium-term priorities of innovative development, high technologies

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it