MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209488027 · doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-970-7-188

CAPRA: A Collaborative Problem Solving Model

2011· book-chapter· en· W3209488027 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Archibald Andrew, Smith Angus

Bibliographic record

VenueNATO science for peace and security series. Sub-series E, Human and societal dynamics · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicComplex Systems and Decision Making
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapraComputer scienceGeographyPsychologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radicalization to violence remains a critical subset of the terrorist threat to Canada. As the lead agency in the Canadian law enforcement response to terrorism, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) National Security Criminal Investigations Program takes a number of innovative community-based approaches to the problem of radicalization to violence. One of these approaches is a problem-solving model called CAPRA that was developed specifically for application in a community policing environment. Named for its five component steps – Clients, Acquiring / Analyzing Information, Partnerships, Response, Assessment – CAPRA plays a critical role in reaching out to at-risk communities and helping those communities develop workable responses to the problem of radicalization to violence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNATO science for peace and security series. Sub-series E, Human and societal dynamicsSame topicComplex Systems and Decision MakingFrench-language works237,207