MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

КВАЗІТОПОНІМИ ТА КОНОТАТИВНІ ТОПОНІМИ НА ПОЗНАЧЕННЯ ПРОВІНЦІЙНОСТИ В НЕФОРМАЛЬНОМУ МОВЛЕННІ ФРАНКОФОНІВ

2021· article· uk· W3209498913 on OpenAlex
Ірина Сергіївна Божко, Iryna Bozhko

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueНауковий вісник Ужгородського університету. Серія Філологія · 2021
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiterature, Language, and Rhetoric Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsToponymyReferentLinguisticsMeaning (existential)Proper nounPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of the article is to investigate the expression of the category of provinciality in quasi-toponyms and connotative toponyms used in the informal speech of Francophones. The actuality of the research is due to the general interest in the problem not only at the scientific but also at the amateur level. A number of phonetic, morphemic, structural and semantic features of these names are revealed. It has been found that the meaning of provinciality is expressed mainly by quasi-toponyms, which are either fictitious names or hybrid names, which contain real toponyms or their elements, but do not have a real referent. Clearly defined connotative toponyms denoting provinciality are less numerous, but this group of proper names has the potential to expand. Connotative place names in some cases denote quite large cities, but are located far abroad. The connection between the phonetic structure of quasi-toponyms and their semantics is revealed. Onomatopoeia, which refers to the sounds of the countryside (especially Quebec), phonetically embedded, albeit hidden obscenities (mainly France), are characteristic features of quasi-toponyms. From the point of view of morphemes, quasi-toponyms are characterized by the use of diminutive suffixes and pseudo-suffixes, which are also observed in real toponyms, based on which quasi-toponyms are formed. One-component quasi-toponyms are the least numerous and the least dynamic among all structural models. Complex quasi-toponyms are constructions with virtually unlimited number of variations. Complex quasi-toponyms can contain fictitious agionyms (models X-article-Y, X-sur-Y) and hydronyms (model X-sur-Y). The latter are mostly real, less often – fictitious. Quasi-toponyms of French-speaking Switzerland are marked by the influences of the German language and often correspond to the model X derriere la lune. Semantically, quasi-toponyms often contain components that implicitly refer to rural realities, emphasizing poor infrastructure, general piety, and lack of entertainment. In some quasi-toponyms, remoteness and hopelessness are expressed explicitly, although somewhat masked graphically. A number of quasi-toponyms are limited in use, related to historical phenomena, or have evolved from poetonyms through transonymization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.593
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.007
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it