MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209581238 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3813703

Three Pillars of the Social Sciences & Humanities Open Marketplace

2020· article· en· W3209581238 on OpenAlexaff
Stefan Buddenbohm, Laure Barbot, Clara Petitfils, Matej Ďurčo, Tomasz Parkoła

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital Humanities and Scholarship
Canadian institutionsHumber Polytechnic
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsDigital humanitiesHumanitiesSociologyPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SSHOC poster presenting the SSH Open Marketplace at the EOSC-hub Week 2020. The SSH Open Marketplace is the only fully-integrated discovery portal which pools and harmonises the tools and services useful for the SSH research communities, offering a high quality and contextualised answer at every step of the research data life cycle. The poster presents the three pillars on which the SSH Open Marketplace is being built: <strong>Integration with existing EOSC services:</strong><br> <em>The SSH Open Marketplace is fully integrated in the EOSC landscape, for example by using the EOSC Federating Core, especially the Federated Identity (AAI) services and the helpdesk.</em> Harmonise views on common themes and foster contact with other organisations operating in the EOSC environment Integration of the marketplace with other EOSC catalogues or marketplaces SSHOC Data and Metadata Interoperability Hub <strong>Fostering Open Science in the SSH domain</strong><br> <em>A researcher needs to perform a textual analysis on historical texts: the SSH Open Marketplace will not only offer software and services suitable for the task, but also tutorials explaining how to properly use the software, as well as academic articles and other resources.</em> Discovery portal for the SSH domain Contextualisation to adopt and reuse the content of the SSH Open Marketplace, no matter if they are a piece of software, a dataset, a research workflow or scientific article Centered around the research scenarios of the SSH community in which training materials have a central role to play <strong>Community-driven curation</strong><br> <em>The SSH Open Marketplace follows a community-driven approach in building SSH part of EOSC. It is a social infrastructure.</em> Community-based curation Three curation pillars: automatic ingest and update of data sources; continuous curation of the information by the editorial team and - most important - contributions from its users Collaborative and user-centric enhancement of content and context The SSH Open Marketplace is being built at the time of the publication of the poster and will undergo its alpha release in June 2020.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.222
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.062 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicDigital Humanities and ScholarshipFrench-language works237,207