New Insights into the Substituents’ Effect on the Formation and Dissociation of Radical Anions: Dissociative Electron Transfer to Arylsulfonylphthalimides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The electrochemical reduction of a series of biologically relevant p‐substituted arylsulfonylphthalimides was investigated and the results were analysed using theoretical calculations and application of Savéant's dissociative electron transfer theory. The dissociation rate constants of the radical anion intermediates were calculated and showed that upon changing the substituent from the MeO, to Me, H, F, Cl and CN the dissociation became faster. A good correlation with the Hammett substituent constants was also obtained. With the NO2 substituent the trend was however inversed. These results and the electrolysis data showed that the dissociation involves the N−S chemical bond. Theoretical calculations showed that for all investigated compounds the extra electron was hosted by the phthalimidyl group except for the p‐NO2 substituted compound for which the extra electron was hosted by the nitrophenyl moiety. Thermodynamic considerations showed that the dissociation of the radical anion of the p‐NO2 compound followed a heterolytic cleavage whereas those of the rest of the investigated compounds followed a homolytic cleavage. The above intriguing result was rationalized through application of the extension of Savéant's dissociative electron transfer theory to the decomposition of radical anions. This study is important not only for understanding substituents’ effect on the biological activity of these compounds but also on the formation and dissociation of radical anions in general.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".