MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209681820 · doi:10.1093/imrn/rnac355

Nonexistence of Negative Curves

2023· article· en· W3209681820 on OpenAlexaff
Javier González‐Anaya, José Luis González, Kalle Karu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Mathematics Research Notices · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsClass (philosophy)Boundary (topology)Point (geometry)Cone (formal languages)Pure mathematicsProjective planeProjective testMathematical analysisGeometryComputer scienceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Let $X$ be the blowup of a weighted projective plane ${\mathbb {P}}(a,b,c)$ at a general point. The Kleiman–Mori cone of $X$ is two-dimensional with one ray generated by the class of the exceptional curve $E$. It is not known if the second extremal ray is always generated by the class of a curve. We construct an infinite family of projective toric surfaces of Picard number one such that their blowups $X$ at a general point have half-open Kleiman–Mori cones: there is no negative curve generating the other boundary ray of the cone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.264
GPT teacher head0.482
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Mathematics Research NoticesSame topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207