MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3209719498 · doi:10.22038/ijogi.2021.19066

The effect of pregnancy nausea and vomiting control training based on Ottawa Nutrition Guidelines on marital satisfaction of pregnant women

2021· article· en· W3209719498 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kokab Basiri Moghaddam, Narges Bahri, Azamsadat Mahmoodian, Asma Forouzande

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Marital satisfaction in pregnancy is one of the determining factors in the survival of cohabitation and pregnancy nausea and vomiting can lead to decreased marital satisfaction. This study was performed with aim to evaluate the effect of nausea and vomiting control training based on the Ottawa Nutrition Guide on marital satisfaction of pregnant women.Methods: This randomized clinical trial study was conducted on 44 pregnant women who referred to comprehensive health service centers of Gonabad in 2019. Participants were randomly assigned to the control and test groups. The training sessions were held based on the Ottawa Nutrition Guide in the test group. The research tools included three questionnaires of demographic information, Enrich marital satisfaction and Rhodes Nausea and Vomiting Scale that were completed before and four weeks after the intervention in two groups. Data were analyzed by SPSS software (version 19) and Independent t-test, Chi-square and Pearson correlation coefficient. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: The research units before the intervention did not have a statistically significant difference in terms of mean Rhodes score (P = 0.28). After the intervention, the mean score of the research units in Rhodes criterion in the experimental group was significantly lower than the control group (P <0.001). Also, before the intervention, total marital satisfaction and most of its components except financial management (P = 0.01), in the control group was significantly higher than the experimental group (P <0.05). Also, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of marital satisfaction after the intervention (P<0.001). Comparison of marital satisfaction in the two groups indicated that the mean score of total marital satisfaction in the experimental group was higher than the control group (P<0.001). In intragroup comparison, marital satisfaction in the experimental group after the intervention had a higher mean (p <0.001), but in the control group, the mean of marital satisfaction decreased significantly (p <0.05).Conclusion: Using the Ottawa Nutrition Guide to reduce nausea and vomiting during pregnancy increases the marital satisfaction of pregnant women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.170
GPT teacher head0.526
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicPregnancy and Medication Impact→French-language works237,207→