MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209745472 · doi:10.22481/aprender.i25.8370

CARTOGRAFIA COMO REFERENCIAL TEÓRICO-METODOLÓGICO PARA INVESTIGAÇÃO DE DOCUMENTOS EDUCACIONAIS

2021· article· pt· W3209745472 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carolina Rodrigues de Souza, Rosanna Maria Araújo Andrade Silva

Bibliographic record

VenueAprender - Caderno de Filosofia e Psicologia da Educação · 2021
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Digital Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No presente trabalho propomos um referencial teórico-metodológico orientado pelo conceito de cartografia. Este conceito foi desenvolvido por Gilles Deleuze e Félix Guattari em Mil Platôs. Pretendemos mostrar que o referencial pode ser utilizado para a investigação de documentos educacionais, análogos aos materiais que Christian Laval utilizou em A escola não é uma empresa. Mostraremos que tais documentos operam a partir de um princípio normativo denominado accountability, e que seu funcionamento é arborescente. Esta característica arborecente dos documentos torna possível sua projeção sobre um mapa, ou seja, torna possível cartografá-los.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.169
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAprender - Caderno de Filosofia e Psicologia da EducaçãoSame topicEducation and Digital TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207