MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209772257 · doi:10.1136/oem-2021-epi.218

P-171 Air recirculation in ventilation system and its impact on trichloramine exposures in a swimming pool Hall: A numerical investigation

2021· article· en· W3209772257 on OpenAlexaffabout
Hélène Proulx, Maximilien Debia, Stéphane Hallé

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Treatment and Disinfection
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceVentilation (architecture)ASHRAE 90.1DeckComputational fluid dynamicsMarine engineeringTRACEREnvironmental engineeringSimulationMeteorologyMechanicsEngineeringPhysicsStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Trichloramine (NCl3) is an irritant gas commonly found in the air of indoor swimming pool, causing health problems to swimmers and workers who are often exposed to this contaminant. ASHRAE recommends a supply air delivery rate of 4 to 8 air changes per hour to remove trichloramine in aquatic centers. However, the fraction of recirculated air can have a significant impact on the exposure level. Objective The main objective of this study is to investigate the impact of air recirculation by mechanical ventilation systems on NCl3 exposures for five user groups: i) swimmers in the basin, ii) people sitting or iii) standing on the deck, iv) lifeguards in surveillance chairs and v) spectators in mezzanine area. Methods Exposure to NCl3 levels in a 9300 m3 swimming pool hall located in Montreal (Canada) is evaluated with a computational fluid dynamic software (Fire Dynamic Simulator). Simulations are performed for five recirculation ratios starting from the reference case at 77% down to 0% (100% fresh air). Emission rate of NCl3 is based on equations found in literature for a fully occupied pool. The numerical model was experimentally validated with tracer gas injection in situ. Results The tracer gas simulation results show good agreement with the experimental results. Compared to the reference case (77% recirculation condition), a 100% fresh air ventilation strategy decreases the NCl3 levels of the five groups from: i) 19%, ii) 31%, iii) 62%, iv) 61% and v) 77%, respectively. Conclusion Reducing the recirculation rate reduces the NCl3 concentrations. However, recirculation of air has less impact on the concentrations in the breathing zones located near the water surface compared to the other zones. The best air quality improvement with the 100% fresh air strategy is for spectators. Other ventilation strategies have to be investigated to improve air quality in the lower breathing zones as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoster presentationsSame topicWater Treatment and DisinfectionFrench-language works237,207