MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Measuring Noise Pollution by Utilizing Bluetooth Low Energy Beacons

2021· article· en· W3209874313 on OpenAlexaff
Evan Fallis, Petros Spachos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBluetooth and Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeaconNoise pollutionComputer scienceNoise (video)BluetoothNoise measurementEnergy consumptionEnergy (signal processing)Bluetooth Low EnergyThe InternetReal-time computingEnvironmental noiseTelecommunicationsWirelessNoise reductionElectrical engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceAcousticsWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A major problem in several modern cities is noise pollution. Noise pollution is any disturbing or unwanted noise that interferes or even harms humans. It has several sources such as public events and vehicular traffic. Being able to characterize areas based on acoustic noise level is useful not only for proving danger in terms of damage to the human ear but also for general discomfort from living near a constantly noisy environment. Internet of Things (IoT) devices can help to collect, process, and characterize acoustic noise, while they offer advantages such as small size and low cost. This work uses small-size Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) beacons to collect audio data in different parts of a city. The data are forwarded to a server station for further characterization and processing. Initial results show the promising performance of the proposed system, in terms of energy consumption and audio data characterization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.499

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBluetooth and Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207