MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209895167

La nuda vida y desaparición forzada (reflexiones en torno al poder soberano desde las tesis de giorgio agamben)

2020· article· es· W3209895167 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAequitas Revue de développement humain handicap et changement social · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophical and Cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Giorgio Agamben en su obra: Homo Sacer. El poder soberano y la nuda vida plantea una tesis que es necesario pensar en el contexto de la filosofia politica y a partir de los procedimientos politicos de nuestras ciudades. Dice Agamben que el campo de concentracion es el paradigma biopolitico de lo moderno. ?Por que esta tesis que de entrada parece inadecuada? ?No estamos en un tiempo donde es mas importante la administracion de todos los aspectos de la vida y por lo mismo la idea de que esta debe asegurarse? ?No es justamente el Estado aquel aparato que debe garantizar la defensa de la vida?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.752
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it