MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209903806 · doi:10.3390/immuno1040027

The Role of APOE and NF-κB in Alzheimer’s Disease

2021· article· en· W3209903806 on OpenAlexaff
Don A. Davies

Bibliographic record

VenueImmuno · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsSt. Boniface Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroinflammationInflammationApolipoprotein EGene isoformDementiaDiseaseTranscription factorNF-κBPathologicalMedicineAlzheimer's diseaseNeuroscienceImmunologyBiologyInternal medicineGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apolipoprotein E (APOE) has three different isoforms, with APOE4 carriers representing a major risk factor for the development of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). AD is the most common form of dementia, and is a relentlessly progressive disorder that afflicts the aged, characterized by severe memory loss. Presently, AD does not have a cure, increasing the urgency for the development of novel therapeutics for the prevention/treatment of AD. The APOE4 isoform is associated with many pathological mechanisms, such as increased neuroinflammation and a reduction in β-amyloid (Aβ) clearance. The accumulation of Aβ plaques in the brain is a hallmark of AD. The presence of APOE4 can increase neuroinflammation via overactivation of the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) pathway. The NF-κB pathway is a family of transcription factors involved with regulating over 400 genes involved with inflammation. AD is associated with sustained inflammation and an overactivation of the NF-κB pathway. Therefore, targeting the APOE4 isoform and suppressing the NF-κB pathway using anti-inflammatory compounds may result in the development of novel therapeutics for the prevention/treatment of AD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImmunoSame topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207