MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

S773 Rapidity of Symptom Control with Upadacitinib Induction Therapy in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Results From Two Randomized Phase 3 Studies

2021· article· en· W3209920981 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicroscopic Colitis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUlcerative colitisInternal medicineGastroenterologyPlaceboCalprotectinClinical trialRandomized controlled trialInflammatory bowel diseasePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Upadacitinib (UPA) is an oral, selective JAK inhibitor investigated for treatment of several immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, including ulcerative colitis (UC). Safety and efficacy of UPA in patients (pts) with moderately to severely active UC were studied in the phase 3 induction trials, U-ACHIEVE (NCT02819635) and U-ACCOMPLISH (NCT03653026). We assessed early (week 2) symptomatic improvement and decrease in biomarkers of inflammation during induction therapy with UPA 45 mg once daily (QC) compared with placebo (PBO). Methods: In the multicentre, double-blind, PBO-controlled U-ACHIEVE and U-ACCOMPLISH trials, pts with moderately to severely active UC were randomized 2:1 to UPA 45 mg QD or PBO for 8 weeks. This analysis evaluated the proportions of pts with clinical remission (per partial Mayo score), clinical response (per partial Mayo score), stool frequency subscore (SFS) ≤1, and rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) of 0, as well as change from baseline in fecal calprotectin and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) at week 2 with UPA vs PBO. Statistical comparison between the two groups was performed according to the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for baseline corticosteroid use (yes or no), baseline Adapted Mayo score (≤7 or >7), according to prior biologic response (bio-IR, biologic inadequate response/bio failure; non-bio-IR, nonbiologic inadequate response/non-bio-failure). Results: As early as week 2, a significantly higher proportion of pts who received UPA achieved clinical remission per partial Mayo score (23%) compared with PBO (5%; treatment difference, [95% CI]: 17.4 [11.8, 23.1]; P < 0.001) in U-ACHIEVE. Results were similar in U-ACCOMPLISH at week 2: UPA (31%) versus PBO (3%); treatment difference (95% CI): 26.5 (20.9, 32.1; P < 0.001). Similarly, higher proportions of pts receiving UPA 45 mg QD achieved other efficacy endpoints, including clinical response, SFS ≤1 and RBS = 0, at week 2 vs PBO (Table 1). Significant decreases from baseline in markers of inflammation (fecal calprotectin and hsCRP levels) were also observed with UPA vs PBO in both trials (Table 1). Safety was comparable with the known safety profile of UPA, and no new safety signals were identified. Conclusion: UPA 45 mg QD achieved rapid improvement in both symptomatic and objective biomarker measures as early as week 2 compared with PBO in pts with moderately to severely active UC. The results demonstrate rapid onset of treatment effect with UPA.Table 1.: Baseline Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Perianal Crohn's Disease

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.458
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it