MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209924627 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.13354

High-Order Signed Distance Transform of Sampled Signals

2021· preprint· en· W3209924627 on OpenAlexaff
Bryce A. Besler, Tannis D. Kemp, Nils D. Forkert, Steven K. Boyd

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptical measurement and interference techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSigned distance functionMathematicsDistance transformMathematical analysisEikonal equationAlgorithmUniquenessComputer visionComputer scienceImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Signed distance transforms of sampled signals can be constructed better than the traditional exact signed distance transform. Such a transform is termed the high-order signed distance transform and is defined as satisfying three conditions: the Eikonal equation, recovery by a Heaviside function, and has an order of accuracy greater than unity away from the medial axis. Such a transform is an improvement to the classic notion of an exact signed distance transform because it does not exhibit artifacts of quantization. A large constant, linear time complexity high-order signed distance transform for arbitrary dimensionality sampled signals is developed based on the high order fast sweeping method. The transform is initialized with an exact signed distance transform and quantization corrected through an upwind solver for the boundary value Eikonal equation. The proposed method cannot attain arbitrary order of accuracy and is limited by the initialization method and non-uniqueness of the problem. However, meshed surfaces are visually smoother and do not exhibit artifacts of quantization in local mean and Gaussian curvature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.116 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicOptical measurement and interference techniquesFrench-language works237,207