MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209943396 · doi:10.3390/fluids6110395

Development of a Scalable Thermal Reservoir Simulator on Distributed-Memory Parallel Computers

2021· article· en· W3209943396 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFluids · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsComputer scienceScalabilityReservoir simulationComputational scienceCorrectnessGridParallel computingDiscretizationDecoupling (probability)Multigrid methodComputer simulationPartial differential equationSimulationAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reservoir simulation is to solve a set of fluid flow equations through porous media, which are partial differential equations from the petroleum engineering industry and described by Darcy’s law. This paper introduces the model, numerical methods, algorithms and parallel implementation of a thermal reservoir simulator that is designed for numerical simulations of a thermal reservoir with multiple components in three-dimensional domain using distributed-memory parallel computers. Its full mathematical model is introduced with correlations for important properties and well modeling. Efficient numerical methods (discretization scheme, matrix decoupling methods, and preconditioners), parallel computing technologies, and implementation details are presented. The numerical methods applied in this paper are suitable for large-scale thermal reservoir simulations with dozens of thousands of CPU cores (MPI processes), which are efficient and scalable. The simulator is designed for giant models with billions or even trillions of grid blocks using hundreds of thousands of CPUs, which is our main focus. The validation part is compared with CMG STARS, which is one of the most popular and mature commercial thermal simulators. Numerical experiments show that our results match commercial simulators, which confirms the correctness of our methods and implementations. SAGD simulation with 7406 well pairs is also presented to study the effectiveness of our numerical methods. Scalability testings demonstrate that our simulator can handle giant models with billions of grid blocks using 100,800 CPU cores and the simulator has good scalability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.617

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it