Intelligent Reflecting Surface-induced Randomness for mmWave Key Generation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Secret key generation in physical layer security exploits the unpredictable random nature of wireless channels. However, the millimeter wave (mmWave) channels have limited multipath and may not be Gaussian distributed. In this paper, for mmWave secret key generation of physical layer security, we use intelligent reflecting surface (IRS) to produce randomness and induce artificial Rayleigh fading directly in the wireless environments. We first formulate the model of IRS-assisted key generation in mmWave environments. The IRS-assisted reflection channel varies according to the IRS weights' variation and induces randomness. When considering the IRS weights are continuous and discrete uniformly distributed, we find that the reflection channel variance is equal to the number of IRS elements. Besides, we prove that the magnitude and phase are Rayleigh and uniformly distributed when the weights are continuously and discretely distributed with more than one quantization bit. With the simulation results verifying the analytical results, this work explains the mathematical principles behind the IRS-assisted physical layer security secret key generation and lays a foundation for future mmWave key generation evaluation and optimization of channel randomness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".