MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209989014 · doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.10.034

Commentary: The mitral annulus in normal valve function. Does shape matter?

2021· letter· en· W3209989014 on OpenAlex
Vincent Chan, Marc Ruel, Thierry Mesana

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJTCVS Techniques · 2021
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMitral annulusAnnulus (botany)Mitral regurgitationMedicineMitral valveCardiologyInternal medicineMitral valve annuloplastyMitral valve repairAnatomyBlood pressureMaterials scienceDiastole

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, the authors from New York University summarize their experience with the annuloplasty system, which they have pioneered, namely the C-G Futureband (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, Minn).1 As the authors have noted in their review, the mitral annulus is dynamic and changes shape on the basis of the pathology involved. In the case of degenerative mitral regurgitation, the mitral annulus becomes more circular. Therefore, mitral annuloplasty reapproximates normal mitral annulus shape and has become a standard component of surgical mitral valve repair.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it