MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3210085732 · doi:10.1007/s100249910018

CASE REPORT: Novel Point Mutation (W184R) in Neonatal Type 2 Gaucher Disease

2000· article· en· W3210085732 on OpenAlexaff
Francis Y.M. Choy, K. Wong, Hilary Vallance, Virginia J. Baldwin

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric and Developmental Pathology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsChildren's & Women's Health Centre of British ColumbiaUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlucocerebrosidasePoint mutationMutationExonGenotypeGeneticsTransition (genetics)Gaucher's diseaseBiologyDiseaseRestriction enzymeMedicineInternal medicineDNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gaucher disease is the most prevalent inherited sphingolipidosis and results from deficient glucocerebrosidase activity. Three clinical forms of Gaucher disease have been described: type 1, or non-neuronopathic; type 2, or acute neuronopathic; and type 3, or subacute neuronopathic. We have identified a novel mutation in a patient of Russian-British descent who died of type 2 Gaucher disease a few hours after birth. A heterozygous T → C transition mutation in exon 6, cDNA nucleotide position 667, results in the substitution of tryptophan by arginine at amino acid residue 184 (W184R) of glucocerebrosidase. This mutation creates a new cleavage site for the restriction endonuclease Hinf1. We developed a method that utilizes Hinf1 restriction endonuclease analysis to confirm the presence of the mutation and test family members. The second mutation identified in the other glucocerebrosidase allele of the patient is mutation L444P, a severe mutation frequent in type 2 and 3 Gaucher disease. Since the patient died very shortly after birth, we postulate that the W184R/L444P genotype may result in little or no detectable glucocerebrosidase activity and thus a poor prognosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric and Developmental PathologySame topicLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207