Tableaux organisateurs de la motricité pendulaire et acrobatique : des outils au service de l’enseignement des activités gymniques et acrobatiques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En se référant aux principes mécaniques, l’étude définit deux types de motricité : la motricité pendulaire aux agrès de préhension et la motricité acrobatique de voltige aux agrès d’impulsions. Dans les deux cas, la réalisation d’un élément gymnique se traduit par l’utilisation d’une énergie transmise à une posture identifiée. L’hypothèse formulée est qu’il est possible de rationaliser la programmation de l’activité gymnique en distinguant un nombre réduit de modalités de création d’énergie nécessaire à la mise en mouvement et en qualifiant un nombre restreint d’organisations posturales. Les tableaux proposés organisent la motricité (pendulaire ou acrobatique) à partir de postures fondamentales et de trois sources d’énergie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.057 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".