MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3210155686 · doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.660373

Regulation of Blood Flow in the Cerebral Posterior Circulation by Parasympathetic Nerve Fibers: Physiological Background and Possible Clinical Implications in Patients With Vertebrobasilar Stroke

2021· review· en· W3210155686 on OpenAlexaff
Arturo Tamayo, Timo Siepmann

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neurology · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaBrandon Regional Health Authority
FundersSächsische Landesbibliothek – Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek DresdenTechnische Universität Dresden
KeywordsMedicineCerebral blood flowCerebral circulationAutonomic nervous systemCardiologyBrainstemParasympathetic nervous systemCerebral perfusion pressureNeuroscienceIschemiaStroke (engine)Internal medicineAnesthesiaBlood pressureHeart ratePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Posterior circulation involves the vertebrobasilar arteries, which supply oxygen and glucose to vital human brainstem structures and other areas. This complex circulatory- perfusion system is not homogenous throughout the day; rather, its hemodynamic changes rely on physiological demands, ensuring brainstem perfusion. This dynamic autoregulatory pattern maintains cerebral perfusion during blood pressure changes. Accumulative evidence suggests that activity within the autonomic nervous system is involved in the regulation of cerebral blood flow. Neither the sympathetic nor parasympathetic nervous systems work independently. Functional studies have shown a tight and complicated cross talk between these systems. In pathological processes where sympathetic stimulation is present, systemic vasoconstriction is followed, representing the most important CNS parasympathetic trigger that will promote local vasodilation. Stroke is a clear example of this process. The posterior circulation is affected in 30% of strokes, causing high morbidity and mortality outcomes. Currently, the management of ischemic stroke is focused on thrombolytic treatment and endovascular thrombectomy within an overall tight 4.5 to 6 h ischemic time window. Therefore, the autonomic nervous system could represent a potential therapeutic target to modulate reperfusion after cerebral ischemia through vasodilation, which could potentially decrease infarct size and increase the thrombolytic therapeutic ischemic window. In addition, shifting the autonomic nervous system balance toward its parasympathetic branch has shown to enhance neurogenesis and decrease local inflammation. Regretfully, the vast majority of animal models and human research on neuromodulation during brain ischemia have been focused on anterior circulation with disappointing results. In addition, the source of parasympathetic inputs in the vertebrobasilar system in humans is poorly understood, substantiating a gap and controversy in this area. Here, we reviewed current available literature regarding the parasympathetic vascular function and challenges of its stimulation in the vertebrobasilar system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeurologySame topicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesFrench-language works237,207