MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3210184877 · doi:10.22215/etd/2019-13673

Parallelization of Vector Fitting Algorithm for GPU Platforms

2019· dissertation· en· W3210184877 on OpenAlexaff
Naveen Elumalai

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceParallel computingSpiceInterconnectionSupercomputerComputational scienceAlgorithmComputer engineeringComputational electromagneticsElectronic engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsElectromagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the continually increasing operating frequencies high-speed effects of modules such as multiconductor interconnect structures and packages are becoming increasingly influential in determining the performance of modern electronic designs. At higher frequencies, they are often characterized by electromagnetic tools yielding tabulated scattering parameter based multiport descriptions or directly using multiport measurements. However, integrating such tabulated data models in regular SPICE like tool environment is a challenge. This was handled by the Vector Fitting (VF) technique, however, it suffers in the presence of large number of ports or poles and becomes computationally slower. To address this problem, recently, parallel vector fitting using multi CPU environment was proposed in the literature. In this thesis, VF algorithm is advanced by proposing the use of the emerging computing platform of GPUs. Several parallel strategies are explored for optimal use of resources: CPUs, GPU and memory, for arriving at better computational performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.574

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectromagnetic Scattering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207