MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3210293312 · doi:10.1111/avsc.12620

Legacies of forest harvesting on plant diversity and plant community composition in temperate deciduous forest

2021· article· en· W3210293312 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Vegetation Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChronosequencePlant communityAlpha diversitySpecies richnessShrubSpecies evennessBasal areaForest managementForest ecologyTemperate forestTemperate deciduous forestEcologyTemperate rainforestGeographySpecies diversityBeta diversityPlant diversityOld-growth forestAgroforestryUnderstoryDeciduousEcological successionCanopyEcosystemForestryEnvironmental scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aims To conserve forest natural heritage, sustainable forest harvesting requires the recovery of plant diversity and ecosystem functions following management. There is a need to clarify the temporal dynamics of plant diversity following harvesting, for both even‐aged and uneven‐aged silvicultural systems. To achieve this goal, the temporal dynamics of plant diversity in the herb layer were measured in unmanaged forests (control) and along a chronosequence (<5 years, 15 years and 30 years after harvesting) for even‐aged and uneven‐aged managed forests. Location Hardwood forest of southern Quebec, Canada. Methods Plant diversity, plant community composition and ecosystem functioning were investigated using metrics exploring richness, evenness and disparity diversity components, and included two scales of diversity partitioning (alpha and beta). Shrub–canopy layer, forest tree species composition and structure, and total forest basal area were also measured. Results In both uneven‐aged and even‐aged managed forest stands, we found: (a) a substantial decrease in mean plant phylogenetic diversity compared with unmanaged forest, even 30 years after harvesting (i.e., decrease of 16% and 22%, respectively); and (b) lowest plant alpha‐diversity in the herb layer 15 years after harvesting. Modification of community composition based upon dissimilarity (beta‐diversity) metrics demonstrated more numerous effects of even‐aged management than uneven‐aged management. For forest composition and structure, plant community and plant traits, dissimilarity relative to the unmanaged control was highest 5 years after even‐aged management. Trait‐based communities were more similar to unmanaged forest at the intermediate levels of forest density (i.e., ~20 m 2 /ha) that were found 5 years after uneven‐aged management. Conclusions Forest management clearly affected diversity, community composition and ecosystem functions along the chronosequence, highlighting the strongest effects of more intensive management (i.e., even‐aged) and the need to improve the sustainability of forest management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it