LG 18650HG2 Li-ion Battery Data for FNN xEV SOC Estimator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The included tests were performed at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada by Dr. Phillip Kollmeyer (phillip.kollmeyer@gmail.com). If this data is utilized for any purpose, it should be appropriately referenced. A brand new 3Ah LG HG2 cell was tested in an 8 cu.ft. thermal chamber with a 75amp, 5 volt Digatron Firing Circuits Universal Battery Tester channel with a voltage and current accuracy of 0.1% of full scale. these data are used in the design process of an SOC estimator using a deep feedforward neural network (FNN) approach. The data also includes a description of data acquisition, data preparation, development of an FNN example script. The test data, or similar data, has been used for some publications, including: Vidal, C.,Kollmeyer, P., Naguib, M., Malysz, P.,Gross, O. and Emadi, A. (2020). Robust xEV Battery State-of-Charge Estimator Design using Deep Neural Networks. [online] Sae.org. Available at: https://www.sae.org/publications/technical-papers/content/2020-01-1181/ [Accessed 28 Jan. 2020]. C. Vidal, P. Kollmeyer, E. Chemali and A. Emadi, "Li-ion Battery State of Charge Estimation Using Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Network with Transfer Learning," 2019 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC), Detroit, MI, USA, 2019, pp. 1-6.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".