MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3210422755 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.1298400

CESNET/simplesamlphp: v1.15.4

2018· article· en· W3210422755 on OpenAlexaff
Olav Morken, Jaime Pérez Crespo, Andreas Åkre Solberg, Thijs Kinkhorst, Tim van Dijen, Hanne Moa, Andjelko Horvat, Mads Freek Petersen, Anders Lund, Tyler Antonio, Nicolas Liampotis, Sergio Gómez, Enrique de la Hoz, mschwager, Patrick Patrick, Jakob Schlyter, Guy Halse, Vincent Rioux, Brook Schofield, mgbellaire-classic, M. Martin, Jacob Christiansen, forevermatt, Remy Blom, Frank Tamás, Brad H. Jones, Stefan Winter, Brian Fenton, Mantas Mikulėnas, gollmann

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SimpleSAMLphp is an award-winning application written in native PHP that deals with authentication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.629

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1880.231

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMathematics, Computing, and Information ProcessingFrench-language works237,207