MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

UNPUBLISHED LETTERS OF L. SIDYAKOV AND L. FRIZMAN

2020· article· en· W3210458690 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueVremennik Pushkinskoi Komissii · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy, History, and Historiography
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoUniversity of PittsburghNorthwestern UniversityNorthern Illinois University
KeywordsValue (mathematics)PublishingCompilerWork (physics)Library scienceClassicsHistoryComputer scienceArtLiteratureEngineeringProgramming languageMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We are publishing the letters of Professor of the University of Latvia Lev Sidyakov (1932—2006) and Professor of Kharkov Pedagogical University Leonid Frizman (1935—2018) that are dedicated to the publication of the work “Seminar on Pushkin” (1997) prepared by Frizman, which, according to the author-compiler, was supposed to fill the gap in publications of this type that had been outlined by that time. The value of Sidyakov’s letters lies in the fact that he is writing a review of the work of a fellow Pushkin scholar. Analyzing the successful aspects of “Seminar,” professor Sidyakov points out omissions and puts forward proposals for improving and supplementing the work

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.750
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVremennik Pushkinskoi KomissiiSame topicPhilosophy, History, and HistoriographyFrench-language works237,207