MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3210517779 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3714460

matplotlib/matplotlib: REL: v3.2.1

2020· article· en· W3210517779 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas A Caswell, Michael Droettboom, Antony Lee, John Hunter, Eric Firing, David Stansby, Jody Klymak, Tim Hoffmann, Elliott Sales de Andrade, Nelle Varoquaux, Jens Hedegaard Nielsen, Benjamin Root, Phil Elson, Ryan May, Darren Dale, Jae‐Joon Lee, Jouni K. Seppänen, Damon McDougall, Andrew Straw, Paul Hobson, Christoph Gohlke, Tony S Yu, Eric Ma, Adrien F. Vincent, Steven Silvester, Charlie Moad, Nikita Kniazev, Paul Ivanov, Elan Ernest, Jan Katins

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is the first bugfix release of the 3.2.x series. This release contains several critical bug-fixes: fix <code>Quiver.set_UVC</code> calls with scalar inputs fix <code>bezier.get_parallels</code> failure from floating point rounding errors fix markers specified as tuples (polygons, stars, or asterisks) fix saving PNGs to file objects in some places fix saving figures using the nbAgg/notebook backend fix saving with tight layout using the PGF backend fix setting custom datapath in rcParams (note: it is still deprecated) fix various issues running setup.py in non-CI environments fix xpdf distiller various minor bug and documentation fixes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.562
Threshold uncertainty score0.625

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0080.005
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5620.548

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMathematics, Computing, and Information ProcessingFrench-language works237,207