Spontaneous Closure of an Idiopathic Full-Thickness Macular Hole: A Literature Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: This work reviews the literature regarding spontaneous closure of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs). Methods: Literature on patients with spontaneous idiopathic FTMH closure was reviewed via Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed through July 16, 2020. A total of 27 of 66 identified articles were included. Results: A total of 68 eyes had spontaneous closure. Of the patients, 62.7% were women and the average age was 67.5 years. Visual acuity improved from Snellen 20/78 to 20/33 post closure. The average hole diameter was 176.8 μm; the largest was 350 μm. Most were stage 2 according to Gass and of small size according to International Vitreomacular Traction Study Group (IVTS) staging. The predominant classification system in recent literature is IVTS staging. The average optical coherence tomography-observed closure time was 4.5 months. Conclusions: On review, reported spontaneous closure rates of all idiopathic FTMH range from 3% to 15%, and no demographic subgroups are more likely to have closure. Holes ≤250 µm have higher closure rates (22.2%) than those in the range of >250 to 400 µm (13.3%) and ≥400 µm (0%). Closure is associated with favorable visual outcomes, and retinal bridging via glial cells is likely critical to closure. These determinations were based on limited numbers; prospective studies are needed to further ascertain rate, mechanism, and characteristics. IVTS staging provides reliable reporting and insight into whether FTMH can be observed before surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".