MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3210536584 · doi:10.4000/books.efr.23115

Hippocrate inventeur de la clinique et les médecins clinicoi

2021· book-chapter· fr· W3210536584 on OpenAlexaff
Véronique Boudon-Millot

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Medicine Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nautical Research Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce chapitre a pour but d’attirer l’attention sur un paradoxe : alors qu’Hippocrate est universellement reconnu comme le père de la médecine clinique basée sur l’observation de signes cliniques et sur des conclusions rationnelles, on ne trouve nulle part dans tout le Corpus hippocratique l’adjectif grec clinicos. De fait, la première occurrence de ce mot se trouve en latin, chez Pline l’Ancien, où l’adjectif clinice sert précisément à qualifier la médecine dite clinique inventée par Hippocrate. L’étude se concentre d’abord sur les deux seuls médecins qualifiés de clinicoi dans le Corpus galénique, Damocrate et Magnos, en s’attachant ensuite à définir l’activité exacte de ces médecins et, pour finir, ce que les médecins de l’époque impériale entendaient par médecine clinique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistory of Medicine StudiesFrench-language works237,207