Bibliographic record
Abstract
A bstract We consider a class of tripartite systems for which two d -dimensional QFTs are cross-coupled via a third d + 1-dimensional “messenger” QFT. We analyse in detail the example of a pair of one-dimensional matrix quantum mechanics) coupled via a twodimensional theory of the BF-type and compute its partition function and simple correlators. This construction is extendible in higher dimensions) using a Chern-Simons “messenger” theory. In all such examples, the exact partition function acquires a form, speculated to correspond to systems dual to Euclidean wormholes and the cross correlators are sufficiently soft and consistent with analogous gravitational calculations. Another variant of the tripartite system is studied, where the messenger theory is described by a non-self-interacting (matrix)-field, reaching similar conclusions. While the Euclidean theories we consider are perfectly consistent, the two possible analytic continuations into Lorentzian signature (messenger vs. boundary QFT directions) of the tripartite models, reveal physical features and “pathologies” resembling those of the expected Lorentzian gravitational backgrounds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".