MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3210569204

In the modern age

2021· book· en· W3210569204 on OpenAlex
Alexandra Palmer

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBloomsbury Academic eBooks · 2021
Typebook
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt, Politics, and Modernism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe artsArt historyPerformance studiesHistorySociologyLibrary scienceArtMedia studiesAnthropologyVisual arts
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

List of Illustrations Introduction Alexandra Palmer (Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Canada) Chapter 1 - Textiles Susan Ward (Independent scholar and curator, USA) Chapter 2 - Production and Distribution Veronique Pouillard (University of Oslo, Norway) Chapter 3 - The Body Adam Geczy (University of Sydney, Australia) and Vicki Karaminas (Massey University, New Zealand) Chapter 4 - Belief Susan J. Palmer (Concordia University, Canada) and Paul Gareau (University of Alberta, Canada) Chapter 5 - Gender and Sexuality Annamari Vanska (Aalto University, Finland) Chapter 6 - Status Jane Tynan (Central Saint Martins, University of the Arts London, UK) Chapter 7 - Ethnicity Simona Segre Reinach (Bologna University, Italy) Chapter 8 - Visual Representations Rachael Barron-Duncan (Central Michigan University, USA) Chapter 9 - Literary Representations Irene Gammel (Ryerson University, Canada) and Katherine Mulhallen (Ryerson University, Canada) Notes Bibliography Notes on Contributors Index

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it