Comparative Analysis of Chloroplast Genomes of Seven Chaetoceros Species Revealed Variation Hotspots and Speciation Time
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chaetoceros is a species-rich diatom genus with broad distribution and plays an important role in global carbon cycle and aquatic ecosystems. However, genomic information of Chaetoceros species is limited, hindering advanced researches on Chaetoceros biodiversity and their differential impact on ecology. In this study, we constructed full-length chloroplast genomes (cpDNAs) for seven Chaetoceros species, including C. costatus , C. curvisetus , C. laevisporus , C. muelleri , C. pseudo-curvisetus , C. socialis , and C. tenuissimus . All of these cpDNAs displayed a typical quadripartite structure with conserved genome arrangement and specific divergence. The sizes of these cpDNAs were similar, ranging from 116,421 to 119,034 bp in size, and these cpDNAs also displayed similar GC content, ranging from 30.26 to 32.10%. Despite extensive synteny conservation, discrete regions showed high variations. Divergence time estimation revealed that the common ancestor of Chaetoceros species, which formed a monophyletic clade at approximately 58 million years ago (Mya), split from Acanthoceras zachariasii at about 70 Mya. The availability of cpDNAs of multiple Chaetoceros species provided valuable reference sequences for studying evolutionary relationship among Chaetoceros species, as well as between Chaetoceros species and other diatom species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".