MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3210642570 · doi:10.1115/1.4052899

Design and Preliminary Validation of Grasp Assistive Device for an Industrial Environment

2021· article· en· W3210642570 on OpenAlexafffund
Daniel Loewen, Naveen Chandrashekar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Devices · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGRASPBellowsCarpal tunnel syndromePhysical medicine and rehabilitationAssistive deviceHand strengthSimulationComputer scienceEngineeringBiomedical engineeringPhysical therapyGrip strengthMedicineMechanical engineeringSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Carpal tunnel syndrome and tendonitis are two common upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders (CTD) related to repetitive and forceful activities in industrial environments. Reducing the muscular force during activities such as the operation of a pistol grip hand tool could result in lower incidence of CTDs. The objective of this research was to reduce the muscular contribution to the grip force using an active grasp assist orthosis system. A novel soft, pneumatic grasp assistive device was designed to augment the users' strength during operation of pistol grip hand tool. The optimized design was fabricated using rapid prototyping. Device effectiveness was quantified by measuring muscle activity and grip force during an in vivo study of a common industrial activity. Nine subjects experienced with power tools employed by an automobile manufacturer installed 18 fasteners using a pistol grip DC tool with and without the grasp assistive device. Surface electromyography (sEMG) was used to measure the activity of four muscles commonly associated with grasping. The grasp assist significantly reduced the mean, combined, normalized muscle activity by 18% (p<0.05). Muscle activation results were contextualized using the revised strain index (RSI). The grasp assistive device trial yielded a significantly lower mean RSI value than the typical trial by 13% (p<0.05). Using an active grasp assist orthosis could reduce the incidence of CTDs in able bodied industrial workers using DC hand tools. The device used a unique design of sinusoidal bellows oriented at 45 deg to the plane of symmetry that yielded higher force output and a lower bending ratio and lower input pressure with acceptable device rigidity and strength.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical DevicesSame topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207