MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3210654728 · doi:10.51656/psycause.v11i2.51360

Agressions sexuelles chez l'enfant: Symptômes de stress post-traumatique et comportements sexuels problématiques

2021· article· fr· W3210654728 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Emma Laflamme, Amée Lapointe, Claudia Samson, Gabriel Martin-Gagnon, Karin Ensink

Bibliographic record

VenuePsycause revue scientifique étudiante de l École de psychologie de l Université Laval · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicChild Abuse and Trauma
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude s’intéresse à l’influence des symptômes du trouble de stress posttraumatique (TSPT) dans l’apparition de comportements sexuels problématiques (CSP) chez les enfants victimes d’abus sexuels âgés de 5 à 12 ans. L’échantillon se compose de 256 dyades mère-enfant, dont 173 dyades dans lesquelles les enfants ont une probabilité élevée d’avoir vécu un ou plusieurs abus sexuels et 83 dyades contrôles dans lesquelles les enfants n’ont pas été victime d’abus sexuel. Chaque groupe est évalué avec le Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) et le Child Sexual Behavior Inventory (CSBI). Les résultats obtenus sont que les enfants victimes d’abus sexuels présentent significativement plus de symptômes du TSPT et développent davantage de CSP que les enfants n’ayant pas vécu d’abus sexuel. De plus, les enfants victimes d’abus sexuels présentant davantage de symptômes du TSPT développent davantage de CSP. Les résultats de cette étude serviront de pistes d’interventions futures afin de prévenir précocement l’apparition de CSP chez les enfants victimes d’abus sexuels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsycause revue scientifique étudiante de l École de psychologie de l Université LavalSame topicChild Abuse and TraumaFrench-language works237,207