MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3210701760 · doi:10.1017/s0033291721004347

Correspondence regarding De Girolamo et al., 2021 ‘A multinational case–control study comparing forensic and non-forensic patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: the EU-VIORMED project’

2021· article· en· W3210701760 on OpenAlexaff
Sheilagh Hodgins, Markku Eronen, Roland Freese, Stephen D. Hart, R. Mueller-Isberner, Deborah Ross, Christopher Webster, Jari Tiihonen

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychological Medicine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of TorontoSimon Fraser UniversityInstitut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de QuébecUniversité de MontréalBC Mental Health & Substance Use Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForensic scienceForensic psychiatryMultinational corporationPsychologySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Content (measure theory)Schizophrenia spectrumPsychiatryMedicineMathematicsPolitical scienceLawPsychosisVeterinary medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1200.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychological MedicineSame topicPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingFrench-language works237,207