MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3210704872 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxab061.084

104 New Presentations of Anorexia Nervosa and Atypical Anorexia Nervosa In Adolescents During the COVID-19 Pandemic

2021· article· en· W3210704872 on OpenAlexaffabout
Holly Agostino, Brett Burstein

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEating Disorders and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnorexia nervosaMedicinePandemicPediatricsIncidence (geometry)Retrospective cohort studyPublic healthMental healthAnorexiaBulimia nervosaEating disordersCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PsychiatryDiseaseInternal medicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Primary Subject area Adolescent Medicine Background The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has had profound effects on adolescent mental health. Beginning in mid-March 2020, public health measures were implemented throughout the province of Quebec, including full school closure and confinement. Previous studies have demonstrated the association between stressful events and the exacerbation of anorexia nervosa (AN), however the association of the COVID-19 pandemic on new AN diagnoses remains unknown. Objectives To assess the incidence and severity of newly diagnosed AN or atypical AN (AAN) cases among adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the five preceding years. Design/Methods We performed a retrospective analysis from Jan 1 2015 to Nov 15 2020 of new eating disorder assessments at an urban tertiary pediatric hospital. Baseline demographic information and clinical assessment variables were collected. The primary outcomes were the incidence of de novo AN or AAN diagnoses and hospitalization within 7 days of diagnosis. Event rate time trends were compared during the period of pandemic public health measures (March 2020 to November 2020) to the proceeding 5-years (January 2015 to February 2020) using an interrupted time series and logistic mixed modeling. Results Overall, 353 patients met inclusion criteria during the study period. Median patient age was 15.9 (IQR 13.8-16.9) years, 93% were female, and 65% of patients were diagnosed with atypical AN. For the full cohort at diagnosis, %mBMI was 92% (SD ±15%) and mean weight loss was 11 Kg (SD ±7Kg). In the 5 years preceding the pandemic, there were 4.5 new AN/AAN cases per month with a modest downward trend (ßcoeff=-0.016). During confinement, new diagnoses rose to 8.0/month with a steep upward trend (ßcoeff=1.417, p < 0 .001). Similarly, hospitalizations for new cases increased from 0.8 to 2.6/month with a significant increase in linear tend (ßcoeff -0.012 vs. 0.500, p < 0 .001). Moreover, patients diagnosed during COVID-19 confinement had a shorter duration of symptoms (6 months vs. 10 months, p=0.001), with a higher percentage of body weight loss (19% vs. 16%, p=0.03) at a faster rate (2.3kg/mo vs. 1.5Kg/mo, p=0.001). Bradycardia was more pronounced at diagnosis during the pandemic (55 bpm vs. 62 bpm, p=0.001) with a greater proportion meeting threshold for admission (38% vs. 19%, p=0.001). Conclusion During the COVID-19 confinement, new diagnoses of AN and AAN nearly doubled and hospitalizations for these patients more than tripled. Markers for disease severity were more pronounced and evolved more rapidly. Findings highlight the urgent need for increased community resources during the pandemic, as well as prospective research to understand drivers and prognosis for these patients more effectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicEating Disorders and Behaviors→French-language works237,207→