Faire résonner les récits de vie : la plateforme numérique « Archives vivantes »
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Centre d’histoire orale et de récits numérisés (CHORN–COHDS) de l’Université Concordia, à Montréal, en collaboration avec l’Association des parents et amis des victimes du génocide contre les Tutsis du Rwanda (PAGE-Rwanda), représentant les survivants du génocide de 1994 vivant désormais à Montréal, ont décidé en 2016 de créer une plateforme numérique pour partager et explorer 28 interviews (vidéos) de survivants. Ce projet de recherche et de création en histoire orale et en humanités numériques a été une occasion non seulement de renouveler la recherche collaborative en histoire orale, mais également de développer de nouvelles façons d’écouter, d’analyser et de transmettre les récits de vie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it