MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3210762127

Physical properties of Hi'iaka from stellar occultation data

2021· article· en· W3210762127 on OpenAlexaffabout
E. Fernández-Valenzuela, José Luis Ortiz Moreno, Bryan J. Holler, Mónica Vara-Lubiano, N. Morales, B. Sicardy, F. Vachier, J. Desmars, F. Braga-Ribas, Emmanuël Jehin, Zafar Rustamkulov, Alexander de la Vega, Elizabeth Warner, Z. Benkhaldoun, Roxanne L. Kamin, Al Ryan, Bernie Earls, Dennis M. Conti, Julien de Wit, Artem Burdanov, Richard Francini, Philip P. Langill, R. Morales, Wesley C. Fraser, D. Souami, J. Lecacheux, P. Santos-Sanz, R. Duffárd, A. Álvarez-Candal, M. Kretlow, Gustavo Benedetti-Rossi, B. E. Morgado, J. I. B. Camargo, F. L. Rommel, A. R. Gomes-Júnior, M. Assafin, D. Baba Aissa, Zaki Grigahcene, M. W. Buie, J. Licandro, M. R. Alarcón, M. Serra‐Ricart, A. J. Castro‐Tirado, Emilio Fernández-García, R. Iglesias-Marzoa, F. Galindo, Luis Pérez, Hugo González, Pablo Canedo, Óscar Blanco, R. D. Goncalves, A. W. Rengstorf, R. L. Flynn, Aart M. Olsen, Bill Hanna, Jason W. Barnes, Joseph A'Hearn, Steven M. Kreyche, William J. Miller, Lillian E. Mortensen, Thomas C. Gibson, Gary Walker, Georgia Stoel McAllister, Gregory A. Feiden, Joseph Froetschel, S. J. Steel, Destin Encardes, R. S. Fisher, Alton Luken, Eric Holcomb, D. B. Caton, Bob Dunford

Bibliographic record

VenueORBi (University of Liège) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of AstrophysicsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOccultationPhysicsAstrophysicsAstronomyAstrobiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two very bright stellar occultations by Hi'iaka, the largest satellite of the dwarf planet Haumea, were predicted to take place during in April 2021. Since the uncertainty on Hi'iaka's shadow path was large due to uncertainty on Hi'iaka's position with respect to Haumea, we performed an observational campaign using medium-sized telescopes to obtain high accuracy astrometric data of Hi'iaka's orbit around Haumea. The astrometric data allowed us to successfully observe the first stellar occultation on April 6[SUP]th[/SUP], with final path crossing North Africa. We only obtained one positive chord in this event from the TRAPPIST-North telescope at Oukaïmeden Observatory (Morocco), but thanks to this detection, we were able to obtain a more accurate path for the second event on April 16[SUP]th[/SUP]. The second shadow path was predicted to cross the continental US from East to West. We carried out a huge observational campaign involving more than 50 professional and amateur observatories across the US and southern Canada. The final path of this second stellar occultation moved slightly to the North of the predicted path and, as a result, we were able to obtain 5 positive chords and negative chords only from the south of the shadow. We also collected photometric data in order to obtain Hi'iaka's rotational light-curve and calculate its three-dimensional shape. The rotational light-curve was obtained by observing the unresolved system of Haumea-Hi'iaka and removing Haumea's rotational light-curve from the data. Using Hi'iaka's rotational light-curve we obtained the rotational phase at which each stellar occultation took place, which allowed us to obtain a three-dimensional model of the satellite. Preliminary results from the stellar occultation show that Hi'iaka, with a triaxial shape as suggested in previous publications, is larger than what has been thought before and with a similar albedo to that of Haumea. In this talk we will present our analysis and preliminary results of some of Hi'iaka's physical properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueORBi (University of Liège)→Same topicAstro and Planetary Science→French-language works237,207→