MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3210765913 · doi:10.1039/d1an01586a

Characterization of ovarian cancer-derived extracellular vesicles by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy

2021· article· en· W3210765913 on OpenAlexafffund
Nina M. Ćulum, Tyler T. Cooper, Gilles Lajoie, Thamara Dayarathna, Stephen Pasternak, Jiahui Liu, Yangxin Fu, Lynne‐Marie Postovit, François Lagugné‐Labarthet

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Analyst · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicExtracellular vesicles in disease
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of AlbertaWestern University
FundersBC Cancer AgencyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOvarian cancerCancer researchMalignancyCancerCancer cellCell cultureExtracellular vesiclesNanoparticle tracking analysisSurface-enhanced Raman spectroscopyVesicleCellRaman spectroscopyChemistryPathologyBiologyMedicineCell biologyInternal medicineMembraneBiochemistryMicrovesiclesRaman scatteringGeneticsGenePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological malignancy, owing to the fact that most cases are diagnosed at a late stage. To improve prognosis and reduce mortality, we must develop methods for the early diagnosis of ovarian cancer. A step towards early and non-invasive cancer diagnosis is through the utilization of extracellular vesicles (EVs), which are nanoscale, membrane-bound vesicles that contain proteins and genetic material reflective of their parent cell. Thus, EVs secreted by cancer cells can be thought of as cancer biomarkers. In this paper, we present gold nanohole arrays for the capture of ovarian cancer (OvCa)-derived EVs and their characterization by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS). For the first time, we have characterized EVs isolated from two established OvCa cell lines (OV-90, OVCAR3), two primary OvCa cell lines (EOC6, EOC18), and one human immortalized ovarian surface epithelial cell line (hIOSE) by SERS. We subsequently determined their main compositional differences by principal component analysis and were able to discriminate the groups by a logistic regression-based machine learning method with ∼99% accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. The results presented here are a great step towards quick, facile, and non-invasive cancer diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.552

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe AnalystSame topicExtracellular vesicles in diseaseFrench-language works237,207