MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3210845384 · doi:10.1681/asn.20213210s180a

COVID-19 and CKD: An Overview of Reviews to Inform the World Health Organization Scientific Brief

2021· article· en· W3210845384 on OpenAlexaff
Sara S. Jdiaa, Razan Mansour, Abdallah El Alayli, Archana Gautam, Preston Thomas, Reem A. Mustafa

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSystematic reviewOdds ratioMEDLINEHazard ratioMeta-analysisConfidence intervalCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Family medicineInternal medicineDiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The World Health organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 as a global pandemic in March of 2020. Many studies have assessed the association between different comorbidities and COVID-19 outcomes. In this overview of reviews, we aim to summarize the association between CKD and different COVID-19 outcomes. Methods: We performed a systematic search through Embase, PubMed, Epistemonikos, and Cochrane as well as preprint databases from January 1, 2020 to January 5, 2021. After searching systematic reviews, we updated the search by identifying primary studies published after August 2020, which was the date of last search in the reviews. We focused on systematic reviews and large primary studies. We followed the GRADE methodology to assess the certainty in effect estimates. Data was pooled based on random effects model. Results: We included a total of 69 systematic reviews and 66 primary studies in our overview. We did not identify any systematic reviews that directly reports on CKD and the risk of contracting COVID-19. There was no convincing difference on the risk of acquiring COVID-19 infection in patients with and without CKD in primary studies (OR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.76-1.33). CKD is associated with higher risk of COVID-19 related mortality pooled hazard ratio (HR) 1.48 (95% CI 1.33-1.65) and pooled odds ratio (OR) 1.77 (95% CI 1.54-2.02)(moderate certainty), hospitalization pooled risk ratio (RR) 1.63 (95% CI 1.03-2.58) (moderate certainty) and disease severity pooled RR 1.56 (95% CI 1.3-1.86) (moderate certainty). Notably, the risk of COVID-19 attributed hospitalization and mortality were higher in patients with more advanced CKD stage. Conclusions: Evidence consistently demonstrated an increased risk of mortality, hospitalization and disease severity in patients with CKD and COVID-19 infection. The results highlight the importance of recognizing patients with CKD as a high-risk group and of prioritizing these patients for COVID-19 prevention strategies including vaccination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.087
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.087
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.011
Bibliometrics0.0330.022
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.485
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology→Same topicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies→French-language works237,207→