MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3210881769 · doi:10.1136/oem-2021-epi.224

P-183 The costs imputable to work stress in European countries: how much does it cost from a societal perspective? A study protocol

2021· article· en· W3210881769 on OpenAlexaff
Hélène Sultan‐Taïeb, Tania Villeneuve, Jean‐François Chastang, Isabelle Niedhammer

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Systems and Public Health
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosocialEuropean unionHealth carePopulationMedicinePublic healthEnvironmental healthIndirect costsAttributable riskActuarial scienceBusinessPsychiatryEconomicsNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Introduction</h3> Work-related psychosocial exposures are highly prevalent in European countries and are associated with various health outcomes, especially mental disorders and cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Evaluations of the economic burden of psychosocial work exposures are however very seldom in the literature. <h3>Objective</h3> To estimate the annual costs of depression and CVD attributable to work-related psychosocial exposures in 28 European Union countries (EU28). <h3>Methods</h3> This study will follow the top-down cost-of-illness (COI) approach, which estimates the economic burden of health conditions in a population from a societal perspective, starting from the total costs of diseases. We will estimate the fractions of these costs that are attributable to work-related psychosocial exposures (attributable fractions, AFs). AF estimates require data on the prevalence of exposure in the whole population, and on the relative risk of developing the disease when exposed to the risk factor. Relative risk estimates will come from a systematic literature review. Prevalence of exposure estimates will derive from an analysis of the 2015 European Working Conditions Survey data. Work-related psychosocial exposures will include the factors from the job strain model, effort-reward imbalance model, and other models/concepts depending on the availability of data. <h3>Results</h3> Our evaluation of costs will include: (1) direct healthcare costs as reimbursed by public healthcare systems: outpatient visit fees to physicians and other health professionals, hospitalisations, emergency room visits and medication, (2) direct healthcare costs as out-of-pocket payments paid by patients, depending on the extent of the public healthcare system in each country, (3) indirect costs due to sickness absences at work, to disability leave, early retirement and premature death, and the cost of presenteeism when available. <h3>Conclusion</h3> This study will provide original and relevant insights on a macro-level for policy-makers and stakeholders when defining public health priorities and preventive strategies in European countries regarding work stress prevention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.530
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoster presentationsSame topicHealthcare Systems and Public HealthFrench-language works237,207