MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3210901532 · doi:10.54216/jisiot.040202

Intelligent Image Detection System Based on Internet of Things and Cloud Computing

2021· article· en· W3210901532 on OpenAlexaff
admin admin, Mhmed Algrnaodi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Intelligent Systems and Internet of Things · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSmart Agriculture and AI
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingArtificial intelligenceImage processingFeature detection (computer vision)Digital image processingComputer visionPreprocessorFeature (linguistics)Digital imageImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Images are the most intuitive way for humans to perceive and obtain information, and they are one of the most important sources of information. With the development of information technology, the use of digital image processing methods to locate and identify targets is widely used, so it is particularly important to detect the targets of interest quickly and accurately in the image. The traditional image detection system has the problems of low detection accuracy, long time consumption, and poor stability. Therefore, this paper proposes the design and research of artificial intelligence image detection system based on Internet of Things and cloud computing. The system designed in this article mainly includes three links, namely: image processing analysis design link in cloud computing environment, image feature collection module design link, and image integration detection link. The main technologies used in image processing and analysis in the cloud computing environment are virtualization technology, distributed massive data storage, and distributed computing. In the image feature collection module, before the image is input to the neural network, it is necessary to perform preprocessing operations on the distorted image and perform perspective correction; then use the deep residual network in deep learning to extract features. Finally, there is the image integration detection link. First, the target category judgment and position correction are performed on the regions generated by the candidate region generation network, and then the integrated image detection is performed through the improved target detection method based on the frame difference method. Through simulation experiments, compared with the traditional image detection system, the speed advantage of the artificial intelligence image detection system designed in this paper is obvious in the case of a large increase in the number of images. On images at different pixel levels, the accuracy of the image detection system proposed in this paper is always higher than that of traditional image detection systems, and the CPU usage and memory usage are at a lower level. In addition, within three months, the stability is also at a relatively high level of 0.9.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Intelligent Systems and Internet of ThingsSame topicSmart Agriculture and AIFrench-language works237,207