MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3210921647 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4673558

Data Management Plan Template: Neuroimaging in the Neurosciences

2021· article· en· W3210921647 on OpenAlexaff
Ted Strauss

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroimagingComputer sciencePlan (archaeology)Data scienceCognitive scienceArtificial intelligencePsychologyNeuroscienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Neuroimaging data management plan (DMP) template is designed to be completed in two phases: Phase 1 questions probe at a high-level, seeking information about the general direction of the study. Normally, researchers will be able to respond to phase 1 questions at the outset of a project. Phase 2 questions seek greater detail. It is understood that these answers will often depend on the outcome of several steps in the research project, such as: a literature review, imaging protocol design and experimental design, or running multiple pilot subjects and interpreting the outcome. As these details become known, the DMP can and should be revisited. This approach underscores that DMPs are living documents that evolve throughout a research project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.088
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.295
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0880.295
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0100.011
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0110.007
Open science0.0060.006
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2940.161

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicHealth, Environment, Cognitive AgingFrench-language works237,207