Developing Effective Communication in Education Perspective Based on Religion, Philosophy, Psychology, and Sociology: An Analysis Study at TKIT Al-Fitrah
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Educational communication is very necessary for the continuity of education. The communication process can take place between superiors to subordinates, fellow colleagues, in teaching and learning or even communication between the school and parents. Here, it is necessary to deliver an effective message. The purpose of this study was to examine the development of effective communication in the perspective of education based on the basis of religion, philosophy, psychology, and sociology, by taking the research location at TKIT ( Taman Kanak-kanak Islam Terpadu or Integrated Islamic Kindergarten) Al-Fitrah in Bandung, West Java, Indonesia . The research method used is a qualitative approach with a case study method to explore certain characters and social aspects. The essence of the philosophical foundation is that it reflects the interaction according to the rules and norms of human relations but still lacks understanding of rhetoric and other communication approaches. The essence of the psychological basis is that it reflects communication at the level of touching psychological factors in a humanistic and persuasive manner. The essence of the social basis is that communication between individuals or groups involves intensity, motivation, and the ability to make communication complex, dynamic, and continuously changing. The recommendations are communication process will be effective if the communicator performs its role, so that a good and expected communication process occurs, where ideas or ideas are discussed in a deliberation between the communicator and the communicant, to lead to agreement and unity in opinion. KEY WORDS: Effective Communication; Educational Communication; Religious Foundation; Philosophical Foundation; Psychological Foundation; Sociology Foundation. About the Authors: Rini Susilowati is a Lecturer at the Polytechnic of Piksi Ganesha, Jalan Gatot Subroto No.301 Bandung, West Java, Indonesia. Erni Furwanti is a Teacher at the Early Childhood Education Programs of Adinda, Jalan Puri Asih V No.25 Bandung. Panji Nurul Fath is a Human Resource Performance Analyst of UPI (Indonesia University of Education), Jalan Dr. Setiabudhi No.229 Bandung. E-mails correspondence: rinisusilo.ppg@gmail.com , erni.furwanti02@gmail.com , and panji_nf@upi.edu Suggested Citation: Susilowati, Rini, Erni Furwanti & Panji Nurul Fath. (2021). “Developing Effective Communication in Education Perspective Based on Religion, Philosophy, Psychology, and Sociology: An Analysis Study at TKIT Al-Fitrah” in EDUCARE: International Journal for Educational Studies , Volume 14(1), August, pp.61-74. Bandung, Indonesia: Minda Masagi Suci and ASPENSI with ISSN 1979-7877 (print) and ISSN 2621-587X (online). Article Timeline: Accepted (June 27, 2021); Revised (July 27, 2021); and Published (August 30, 2021).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".