MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3211073257 · doi:10.3138/ctr.188.002

Co-Carrying Rupture and Repair

2021· article· en· W3211073257 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Lisa Cooke Ravensbergen

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVietnamese History and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCeremonyTransformational leadershipEmbodied cognitionColonialismFutures contractSpace (punctuation)Work (physics)AestheticsHistoryVisual artsSociologyArtPsychologyEngineeringEpistemologyArchaeologyPhilosophySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Through evocative and holistic description, this article investigates how ceremony performs its spiritual, communal, pedagogical, and embodied work. Identifying ceremony as transformational, as carrying memory, and as medicine work, she contrasts it with settler-Canadian theatre practices and histories, which she identifies as colonial apparatus that, in their preoccupation with imperialism, have actually been pre-occupied by sacred processes, relationship, and memory. She suggests that the pandemic has deepened a rupture, opening space for reckoning and for the transformation of potential futures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.510
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicVietnamese History and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207