MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3211088184 · doi:10.1136/oem-2021-epi.219

P-175 Understanding the association between treatment modality versus employment status among patients with organ failure

2021· article· en· W3211088184 on OpenAlexaffabout
Anil Adisesh, Vijay Kumar Chattu, Sumaya Dano, Istvan Musci, Nathaniel Edwards

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDialysisLogistic regressionEthnic groupPsychosocialMarital statusInternal medicineDemographyPopulationEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Objectives</h3> In advanced organ failure patients: (1) To study the association between treatment modality versus employment status, (2) To analyze socio-demographic profiles and deprivation status, and (3) To explore Return to Work (RTW) by analysis of self-reported employment status. <h3>Methods</h3> This ongoing hospital based cross-sectional study used a convenience sample: 1070 patients with advanced organ failure requiring solid organ transplant (SOT) or dialysis pooled from the Comprehensive Psychosocial Research Data System at UHN, Toronto. Patient reported outcome measures, clinical and socio-demographic variables were collected from stable outpatients on iPads using electronic data capture (DAta Driven Outcomes System-DADOS, Techna Institute, UHN, Toronto). The Ontario Marginalization Index characterized material deprivation. Data was analyzed using STATA v16, logistic regression used multiple imputation by chained equations. <h3>Results</h3> Of 1070 SOT recipients, 646 (60%) were males with 424 (40%) females. Almost half (49%) were of White ethnicity, Black (23%) followed by South Asians and East Asians. 63% (646) had &gt;12 years education, the kidney-pancreas sub-group were highest 88% (30) then kidney, liver and dialysis with 65%, 62% and 59%, respectively. 51% of dialysis patients had a yearly income of $70,000. These results reflect the higher employment status of kidney (60%), liver (55%) and kidney-pancreas (51%) transplants compared to dialysis patients (28%). 59% of dialysis patients had high deprivation. The association between treatment modality vs employment status and employment status vs deprivation remained statistically significant after adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity and comorbidities in logistic regression models. <h3>Conclusion</h3> SOT was associated with significantly higher odds of employment and lower material deprivation. Dialysis, transplant and occupational health professionals should support SOT and dialysis patients overcoming barriers to maintain and RTW. RTW post-SOT is complex and likely associated with personal, professional, societal and medical factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.835

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoster presentationsSame topicGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesFrench-language works237,207