L’insertion professionnelle des enseignants au travers des multiples aspects de la socialisation au travail : l’ISaTE, un instrument de mesure pour les appréhender
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude présente la conception et le processus de validation d’un instrument de mesure de la socialisation au travail des enseignants débutants. Un total de 1487 enseignants de différents niveaux d’enseignement obligatoire ont été interrogés. Les fondations théoriques ainsi que les analyses factorielles exploratoires et confirmatoires mettent en évidence quatre dimensions de socialisation au travail : la socialisation au groupe de travail, au climat micropolitique, aux tâches d’enseignement ainsi qu’à l’organisation. L’instrument proposé présente, en respect de différents critères consensuels quant aux processus de validation d’échelles, des arguments de validité élevés. Cette contribution nourrit l’enjeu majeur d’une approche globalisante de l’insertion des enseignants qui va au-delà des approches centrées sur le travail de l’enseignant en classe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.037 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".