MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3211227120 · doi:10.1136/oem-2021-epi.188

P-77 Work-related traumatic fatality in the Canadian province of Saskatchewan, 2007–2018: trends and association with economic factors

2021· article· en· W3211227120 on OpenAlexaffabout
Samuel Kwaku Essien, Cindy Feng, Catherine Trask

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeather Research and Forecasting ModelCase fatality ratePoisson regressionDemographyWork (physics)GeographyMedicineMeteorologyPopulationEngineeringSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Understanding the extent of work-related fatality (WRF) burden can provide insight into prevention efforts. The Canadian province of Saskatchewan demonstrates an increased WRF burden over other provinces. Still, the evolution of this WRF burden over time remains unclear and this limits understanding of the true pattern of fatalities at the workplace and identification of potential WRF leading indicators. This study examined the WRF rate in Saskatchewan over the past decade, as well as potential risk factors. <h3>Methods</h3> Retrospective linked Saskatchewan workplace traumatic fatalities and Statistics Canada labour force survey data were used. Fatality cases were then aggregated by year, season, worker characteristics (e.g., age, sex, and industry type), total employment, total labour force, and the number of unemployed workers. Yearly WRF rates were calculated using the number of fatalities as the numerator and yearly total employment numbers as the denominator. A generalized additive model with Poisson distribution was carried out to examine the association of WRF rates to personal characteristics and economic indicators. <h3>Results</h3> The study identified 220 traumatic WRF cases from 2007 to 2018. The average twelve-year WRF rate was 0.28 ± 0.07 per 100,000, with a stable WRF rate observed between 2013–2014 and 2015–2017 and an increasing trend between 2017–2018. Men were 13 times more likely to have WRF than women (RR=13.7, 95% CI: 10.48–17.9), and participants aged 60+ years were disproportionately affected by WRF (0.70 ± 0.21 per 100,000). The construction industry experienced the highest WRF risk (RR=9.2, 95%CI 6.1–13.8). Risk of WRF was found to increase with unemployment rate, but dropped when unemployment rate was highest. <h3>Conclusion</h3> The study findings show a rising trend in recent (2017–2018) WRF rate, with transient increases in unemployment rate compounding the problem. Targeting prevention strategies towards high-risk population and age groups and during periods of economic downturn could help address fatalities at work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score0.775

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoster presentationsSame topicOccupational Health and Safety ResearchFrench-language works237,207