MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3211317402 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.211134-f

Les patients canadiens devraient-ils fonder leurs espoirs sur l’aducanumab pour la maladie d’Alzheimer?

2021· article· fr· W3211317402 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jennifer Watt, Roger Marple, Brenda R. Hemmelgarn, Sharon E. Straus

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoUniversity of AlbertaSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHumanitiesAlzheimer's diseaseGynecologyPhilosophyInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Points clés Au Canada, 190 000 personnes ont une démence légère de type Alzheimer, et entre 532 000 et 799 000 vivent avec une atteinte cognitive amnésique légère[1][1]–[4][2]. La mise au point de traitements pour la maladie d’Alzheimer est complexe et les quelques agents efficaces

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207