Constructing and representing exchange–correlation holes through artificial neural networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One strategy to construct approximations to the exchange–correlation (XC) energy EXC of Kohn–Sham density functional theory relies on physical constraints satisfied by the XC hole ρXC(r, u). In the XC hole, the reference charge is located at r and u is the electron–electron separation. With mathematical intuition, a given set of physical constraints can be expressed in a formula, yielding an approximation to ρXC(r, u) and the corresponding EXC. Here, we adapt machine learning algorithms to partially automate the construction of X and XC holes. While machine learning usually relies on finding patterns in datasets and does not require physical insight, we focus entirely on the latter and develop a tool (ExMachina), consisting of the basic equations and their implementation, for the machine generation of approximations. To illustrate ExMachina, we apply it to calculate various model holes and show how to go beyond existing approximations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it