Genetic characterization of ESBL/pAmpC-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> isolated from forest, urban park and cereal culture soils
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Little is known about the role of forestland and non-fertilized agriculture soils as reservoirs of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and plasmid-borne AmpC (pAmpC)-producing Escherichia coli isolates. Thus, in the present study, 210 soil samples from various origins (forest of Oued Zen (Ain Drahem), non-agriculture soils from different park gardens in Tunis City, cereal culture soils and home gardens) were investigated to characterize cefotaxime-resistant E. coli isolates. A total of 22 ESBL/pAmpC-producing E. coli were collected, and all harbored variants of the blaCTX-M gene (15 blaCTX-M-1, 5 blaCTX-M-55 and 2 blaCTX-M-15). A total of seven and two isolates harbored also blaEBC and blaDHA-like genes, respectively. Resistances to tetracycline, sulfonamides and fluoroquinolones were encoded by tetA (n = 4)/tetB (n = 12), sul1 (n = 17)/sul2 (n = 19) and aac(6')-Ib-cr (n = 2)/qnrA (n = 1)/qnrS (n = 1) genes, respectively. A total of seven isolates were able to transfer by conjugation cefotaxime-resistance in association or not with other resistance markers. PFGE showed that ten and two isolates were clonally related (pulsotypes P1 and P2). The 10 P1 isolates had been collected from forestland, cereal culture soils and an urban park garden in Tunis City, arguing for a large spread of clonal strains. Our findings highlight the occurrence of ESBL/pAmpC-E. coli isolates in soils under limited anthropogenic activities and the predominance of CTX-M enzymes that are largely disseminated in E. coli from humans and animals in Tunisia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".